The U.S. Departments of Education and Labor announced a significant policy shift on May 13, 2026, that will change how states plan and fund career technical education. For the first time, states can now integrate their Perkins V state plans directly into their Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Combined State Plans—creating a single, unified document that aligns K-12 CTE programs with adult workforce development, unemployment insurance, and vocational rehabilitation services.
Seventeen states have already submitted combined plans that include Perkins V integration, with several more in draft form. The move effectively dismantles one of the longest-running structural barriers in workforce policy: the separation between the education system that trains students and the workforce system that places adults in jobs.
Why This Matters: Two Silos, One Pipeline
For decades, federal workforce and education policy have operated on parallel tracks. WIOA—administered by the Department of Labor—funds adult education, dislocated worker programs, and American Job Centers. Perkins V—administered by the Department of Education’s Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education (OCTAE)—funds secondary and postsecondary CTE programs. States submit separate plans for each, often with different data systems, different reporting timelines, and different definitions of success.
The result has been predictable. High school CTE directors design programs without real-time access to local labor market data from the workforce system. Workforce boards allocate training funds for adults without visibility into what credentials or skills high school CTE programs are already producing. Students graduate with industry credentials that may or may not align with what local employers actually need.
The new combined plan option changes that. States that opt in must submit a single four-year plan that integrates Perkins V with the core WIOA programs: Title I (adult, dislocated worker, and youth services), Title II (adult education), Title III ( Wagner-Peyser employment services), and Title IV (vocational rehabilitation). The unified planning framework requires states to identify shared performance indicators, coordinate service delivery across agencies, and align education and training investments with regional labor market demand.
What the Combined Plans Actually Require
The new framework isn’t just administrative convenience. States must demonstrate concrete coordination across several dimensions:
Shared data and performance accountability. Combined plans must include unified reporting on employment outcomes, credential attainment, and earnings—not just for adult workforce participants, but for secondary CTE concentrators as well. This means CTE programs will now be measured partly on whether their graduates get jobs and earn sustainable wages, not just whether they pass certification exams.
Coordinated service delivery. The plans require states to describe how American Job Centers, secondary CTE programs, and community colleges will refer participants across systems, share labor market information, and avoid duplicative training. For a student at a career and technical center, this could mean a direct referral pathway from a high school welding program to a registered apprenticeship funded through WIOA Title I.
Alignment with economic development strategies. Combined plans must demonstrate that education and training investments support the state’s broader economic development priorities. This ties CTE program approval directly to state-level industry cluster strategies—something that has historically been advisory at best.
Unified state leadership and governance. The plans require states to identify a single lead entity—or a clearly defined interagency governance structure—with authority to coordinate across education, labor, and economic development agencies. For states with fragmented CTE governance, this is a significant structural shift.
Which States Are Moving First
The seventeen states that have already submitted combined plans span the political and geographic map: Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and Vermont. Several others—including Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Colorado—are in active draft development.
Florida’s submission is representative of the new approach. Under the leadership of CareerSource Florida and Commissioner of Education Anastasios Kamoutsas, the state’s combined plan explicitly frames Perkins V integration as a step toward “further aligning education and workforce priorities” and ensuring that “students have direct pathways to high-wage, high-demand careers while building a talent pipeline that meets the demands of today’s economy.”
Massachusetts, fresh off its $70 million CTE capital grant announcement, is also among the early adopters. The state’s combined plan ties its CTE expansion strategy—including the new capital grants and the CTE Capital Annex Pilot program—directly to its Workforce Skills Cabinet’s sector partnership model. The state is essentially using the combined plan to institutionalize the connections between its secondary CTE investments and its adult workforce pipeline.
Mississippi’s submission highlights the rural and equity dimensions. Executive Director Dr. William Ashley of the Mississippi Department of Employment Security framed the plan as ensuring “every Mississippian has access to quality jobs” through strategic alignment of workforce, education, and training investments.
What This Means for CTE Programs on the Ground
For CTE directors and instructors, the combined plan shift creates both opportunities and pressure.
On the opportunity side, programs that have strong employer partnerships and measurable employment outcomes will be better positioned to demonstrate value under unified accountability. CTE programs that already track graduate placement, wages, and credential stacking will find their data directly relevant to the new state planning requirements. Programs with articulation agreements to community colleges and registered apprenticeships will be able to show seamless pathways that the combined plans are designed to promote.
On the pressure side, programs that have operated in isolation from local workforce boards or American Job Centers will need to build those connections quickly. The combined plans require formal partnership structures—not just informal relationships. For programs that have never reported graduate earnings to the state, the new data requirements will be a significant lift.
The shift also creates new competition for resources. With WIOA and Perkins V funds now being planned together, states may reallocate dollars across the two systems. CTE programs that can’t demonstrate labor market alignment may find themselves competing more directly with adult workforce training providers for state-level funding decisions.
Challenges and Criticisms
Not everyone is convinced the combined plans will deliver on their promise. Several state CTE administrators have raised concerns about implementation capacity—particularly the challenge of integrating data systems that were never designed to talk to each other.
“The concept is sound,” said one state CTE director who asked not to be named because their state’s plan is still under review. “But our student information system, our postsecondary data system, and our workforce development board’s case management system are three separate platforms with different student identifiers. Getting unified performance reporting out of that is a multi-year project, not a checkbox.”
Others have raised concerns about whether the Department of Labor—which has historically focused on adult employment outcomes—will understand the nuances of secondary CTE program quality. The Trump administration’s decision to shift day-to-day CTE program management to the Department of Labor through an interagency agreement has already raised questions among education advocates about whether the educational side of career exploration and pathway development will get adequate attention.
The combined plan framework does not resolve those tensions. It simply makes them more visible by putting both systems under a single planning document.
What’s Next
States with approved combined plans will now move into implementation, with the first unified performance reports due in 2027. The Departments of Education and Labor have indicated they will provide technical assistance for data system integration and cross-agency coordination, though funding for that assistance has not been specified.
For CTE programs, the near-term action is clear: establish or strengthen relationships with local workforce boards, American Job Centers, and economic development agencies. Document employment outcomes for graduates. Align program offerings with the priority industry sectors identified in your state’s economic development strategy. And prepare for a planning environment where CTE accountability is no longer separate from workforce accountability.
The combined state plan option has been available since Perkins V was reauthorized in 2018, but states have been slow to adopt it. The May 2026 announcement—with 17 states already on board and the departments actively encouraging more—suggests the policy window is now open. Whether it becomes a meaningful integration of education and workforce systems or simply a paperwork merger will depend on implementation at the state and local level.
—
Sources:
- US Department of Education and US Department of Labor Announce Historic Expansion of WIOA Combined State Plans — U.S. Department of Labor
- OCTAE Policy Guidance on Perkins V State Plan Integration — U.S. Department of Education
- Florida Combined State Plan Submission — CareerSource Florida
- Massachusetts Workforce Skills Cabinet — Mass.gov
- Perkins V and WIOA Alignment Framework — Association for Career and Technical Education
